A 8\u00aa Turma do Tribunal Regional Federal da 1\u00aa Regi\u00e3o (TRF1) manteve a senten\u00e7a que determinou o cancelamento da penhora sobre um im\u00f3vel residencial da parte executada, pelo fato de o devedor residir no im\u00f3vel, entendendo, assim, consistir o im\u00f3vel em bem de fam\u00edlia, mesmo n\u00e3o sendo o \u00fanico im\u00f3vel do embargante.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A Fazenda Nacional alega que o embargante n\u00e3o juntou provas de que reside no im\u00f3vel objeto da penhora nem que possui apenas este im\u00f3vel, n\u00e3o havendo que se falar que o bem em quest\u00e3o estaria protegido pela Lei 8.009\/1990.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ao analisar o caso, o relator, desembargador federal Hercules Fajoses, destacou que a jurisprud\u00eancia do Superior Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a (STJ) e do TRF1 \u00e9 no sentido de que a exist\u00eancia de mais de um im\u00f3vel de propriedade do devedor n\u00e3o afasta a condi\u00e7\u00e3o de bem de fam\u00edlia daquele que lhe serve de moradia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Assim, concluiu o magistrado, \u201co apelado obteve \u00eaxito em desincumbir-se do \u00f4nus probat\u00f3rio de demonstrar que o im\u00f3vel objeto da controv\u00e9rsia \u00e9 utilizado como resid\u00eancia do n\u00facleo familiar, o que afasta a possibilidade de constri\u00e7\u00e3o pretendida pela apelante, nos termos da Lei 8.009\/1990\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Processo: 0015377-35.2003.4.01.3300<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
TRF1 26.11.2021<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A 8\u00aa Turma do Tribunal Regional Federal da 1\u00aa Regi\u00e3o (TRF1) manteve a senten\u00e7a que…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1850,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[26],"tags":[1468,264,1469],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/pexels-photo-101808.jpeg?fit=1880%2C1253&ssl=1","featured_image_urls":{"full":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/pexels-photo-101808.jpeg?fit=1880%2C1253&ssl=1",1880,1253,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/pexels-photo-101808.jpeg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/pexels-photo-101808.jpeg?fit=300%2C200&ssl=1",300,200,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/pexels-photo-101808.jpeg?fit=640%2C427&ssl=1",640,427,true],"large":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/pexels-photo-101808.jpeg?fit=640%2C426&ssl=1",640,426,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/pexels-photo-101808.jpeg?fit=1536%2C1024&ssl=1",1536,1024,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/pexels-photo-101808.jpeg?fit=1880%2C1253&ssl=1",1880,1253,true],"covernews-slider-full":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/pexels-photo-101808.jpeg?resize=1077%2C715&ssl=1",1077,715,true],"covernews-slider-center":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/pexels-photo-101808.jpeg?resize=522%2C500&ssl=1",522,500,true],"covernews-featured":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/pexels-photo-101808.jpeg?fit=1024%2C682&ssl=1",1024,682,true],"covernews-medium":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/pexels-photo-101808.jpeg?resize=540%2C285&ssl=1",540,285,true],"covernews-medium-square":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/pexels-photo-101808.jpeg?resize=375%2C250&ssl=1",375,250,true]},"author_info":{"display_name":"bfsadvocacia","author_link":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/author\/bfsadvocacia\/"},"category_info":"atualidade jur\u00eddica<\/a>","tag_info":"atualidade jur\u00eddica","comment_count":"0","amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1848"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1848"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1848\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1851,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1848\/revisions\/1851"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1850"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1848"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1848"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1848"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}