A Corte Especial do Tribunal Regional Federal da 1\u00aa Regi\u00e3o (TRF1), de forma un\u00e2nime, negou provimento a agravo interno interposto pelo Instituto Nacional do Seguro Social (INSS) contra decis\u00e3o que negou seguimento ao recurso extraordin\u00e1rio ao Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) que pretendia suspender pens\u00e3o por morte para um menor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
O INSS argumentou que o Tema 1.028 de repercuss\u00e3o geral no STF, o qual aponta rejei\u00e7\u00e3o de no caso de discuss\u00e3o sobre a comprova\u00e7\u00e3o dos requisitos inscritos na legisla\u00e7\u00e3o que rege os benef\u00edcios da previd\u00eancia social necess\u00e1rios \u00e0 concess\u00e3o da pens\u00e3o por morte seria inaplic\u00e1vel ao caso dos autos, sob a tese de que a hip\u00f3tese \u00e9 de discuss\u00e3o do direito de menor sob guarda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ao analisar o caso, a relatora, desembargadora federal \u00c2ngela Cat\u00e3o, afirmou que o STF determinou a devolu\u00e7\u00e3o dos autos por entender que a quest\u00e3o n\u00e3o se aplica \u00e0 sistem\u00e1tica da repercuss\u00e3o geral do Tema 1.028 e decidiu que n\u00e3o h\u00e1 repercuss\u00e3o geral. \u201cA alega\u00e7\u00e3o de que o Tema 1.028 n\u00e3o teria aplica\u00e7\u00e3o no caso dos autos n\u00e3o deve receber guarida, posto que a sua incid\u00eancia no caso foi determinada pelo STF, em decis\u00e3o que o INSS n\u00e3o recorreu. Seja como for, o STF, em pronunciamento recente, na ADI 4878, firmou o entendimento de que o menor sob guarda \u00e9 dependente para fins de concess\u00e3o de benef\u00edcio previdenci\u00e1rio, desde que comprovada a depend\u00eancia econ\u00f4mica\u201d, destacou ao finalizar o voto.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Processo 0037550-78.2001.4.01.9199<\/p>\n\n\n\n
TRF1 11.05.2022<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
O INSS argumentou que o Tema 1.028 de repercuss\u00e3o geral no STF<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2509,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[11,12],"tags":[1812,22,17,1814],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/pexels-photo-827993.jpeg?fit=1880%2C1253&ssl=1","featured_image_urls":{"full":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/pexels-photo-827993.jpeg?fit=1880%2C1253&ssl=1",1880,1253,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/pexels-photo-827993.jpeg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/pexels-photo-827993.jpeg?fit=300%2C200&ssl=1",300,200,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/pexels-photo-827993.jpeg?fit=640%2C427&ssl=1",640,427,true],"large":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/pexels-photo-827993.jpeg?fit=640%2C426&ssl=1",640,426,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/pexels-photo-827993.jpeg?fit=1536%2C1024&ssl=1",1536,1024,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/pexels-photo-827993.jpeg?fit=1880%2C1253&ssl=1",1880,1253,true],"covernews-slider-full":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/pexels-photo-827993.jpeg?resize=1077%2C715&ssl=1",1077,715,true],"covernews-slider-center":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/pexels-photo-827993.jpeg?resize=522%2C500&ssl=1",522,500,true],"covernews-featured":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/pexels-photo-827993.jpeg?fit=1024%2C682&ssl=1",1024,682,true],"covernews-medium":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/pexels-photo-827993.jpeg?resize=540%2C285&ssl=1",540,285,true],"covernews-medium-square":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/pexels-photo-827993.jpeg?resize=375%2C250&ssl=1",375,250,true]},"author_info":{"display_name":"bfsadvocacia","author_link":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/author\/bfsadvocacia\/"},"category_info":"advogado sp<\/a> Direito Previdenci\u00e1rio<\/a>","tag_info":"Direito Previdenci\u00e1rio","comment_count":"0","amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2504"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2504"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2504\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2510,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2504\/revisions\/2510"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2509"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2504"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2504"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2504"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}