{"id":3132,"date":"2022-11-07T07:46:00","date_gmt":"2022-11-07T10:46:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/?p=3132"},"modified":"2022-10-31T17:49:00","modified_gmt":"2022-10-31T20:49:00","slug":"inss-tem-90-dias-para-analisar-requerimento-de-portador-de-deficiencia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/2022\/11\/07\/inss-tem-90-dias-para-analisar-requerimento-de-portador-de-deficiencia\/","title":{"rendered":"INSS tem 90 dias para analisar requerimento de portador de defici\u00eancia"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>A 2\u00aa Turma do Tribunal Regional Federal da 1\u00aa Regi\u00e3o (TRF1) determinou que o Instituto Nacional do Seguro Social (INSS) tem 90 dias para analisar o requerimento administrativo de concess\u00e3o de amparo social a uma pessoa com defici\u00eancia.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ap\u00f3s decis\u00e3o que determinou a an\u00e1lise do requerimento no prazo de&nbsp;10 dias, o INSS recorreu ao TRF1 requerendo a reforma da senten\u00e7a, alegando aus\u00eancia legal na fixa\u00e7\u00e3o de prazo para o Instituto se pronunciar acerca do pedido.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Consta nos autos que o requerimento do benef\u00edcio foi realizado em 16\/09\/2019 e a a\u00e7\u00e3o foi movida contra o INSS em 20\/01\/2021, portanto, ap\u00f3s lapso temporal de mais de um ano.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>O relator do processo no TRF1, desembargador federal Rafael Paulo Soares Pinto, destacou que o entendimento firmado \u00e9 de que a demora injustificada representa les\u00e3o a direito subjetivo individual, pass\u00edvel de repara\u00e7\u00e3o com determina\u00e7\u00e3o de prazo razo\u00e1vel para faz\u00ea-lo.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Altera\u00e7\u00e3o de prazo&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp;O magistrado destacou&nbsp;que&nbsp;a Administra\u00e7\u00e3o P\u00fablica deve apreciar requerimentos no prazo de 30 dias, prorrog\u00e1veis por igual per\u00edodo, com apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o de justificativa encaminhada ao requerente, conforme art. 49 da Lei 9.784\/1999.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Contudo, destacou o relator, em acordo estabelecido no \u00e2mbito do Recurso Extraordin\u00e1rio (RE) 1.171.152\/SC, o Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) fixou prazo de 90 dias para an\u00e1lise quando se tratar de benef\u00edcio de amparo social \u00e0 pessoa portadora de defici\u00eancia.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Assim, o desembargador concluiu que o recurso merece ser parcialmente atendido, sendo reformada a senten\u00e7a no que se refere ao prazo concedido e fixado, em 90 dias, o tempo para an\u00e1lise do pedido formulado ao INSS.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Em concord\u00e2ncia aos fundamentos do relator, a 2\u00aa Turma do Tribunal Regional Federal da 1\u00aa Regi\u00e3o decidiu atender parcialmente o recurso, determinando que o INSS analise o requerimento do benef\u00edcio em at\u00e9 90 dias.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Processo: 1000179-30.2021.4.01.4101\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TRF1 19.10.2022<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A 2\u00aa Turma do Tribunal Regional Federal da 1\u00aa Regi\u00e3o (TRF1) determinou que o Instituto&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2882,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[11,28,12],"tags":[1271,54,1136,1778,17,1777,2246],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/pexels-photo-927690.jpeg?fit=1880%2C1183&ssl=1","featured_image_urls":{"full":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/pexels-photo-927690.jpeg?fit=1880%2C1183&ssl=1",1880,1183,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/pexels-photo-927690.jpeg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/pexels-photo-927690.jpeg?fit=300%2C189&ssl=1",300,189,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/pexels-photo-927690.jpeg?fit=640%2C403&ssl=1",640,403,true],"large":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/pexels-photo-927690.jpeg?fit=640%2C403&ssl=1",640,403,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/pexels-photo-927690.jpeg?fit=1536%2C967&ssl=1",1536,967,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/pexels-photo-927690.jpeg?fit=1880%2C1183&ssl=1",1880,1183,true],"covernews-slider-full":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/pexels-photo-927690.jpeg?resize=1115%2C715&ssl=1",1115,715,true],"covernews-slider-center":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/pexels-photo-927690.jpeg?resize=800%2C500&ssl=1",800,500,true],"covernews-featured":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/pexels-photo-927690.jpeg?fit=1024%2C644&ssl=1",1024,644,true],"covernews-medium":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/pexels-photo-927690.jpeg?resize=540%2C340&ssl=1",540,340,true],"covernews-medium-square":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/pexels-photo-927690.jpeg?resize=400%2C250&ssl=1",400,250,true]},"author_info":{"display_name":"bfsadvocacia","author_link":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/author\/bfsadvocacia\/"},"category_info":"<a href=\"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/category\/advogado-sp\/\" rel=\"category tag\">advogado sp<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/category\/atualidades-juridicas\/\" rel=\"category tag\">atualidades jur\u00eddicas<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/category\/direito-previdenciario\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Direito Previdenci\u00e1rio<\/a>","tag_info":"Direito Previdenci\u00e1rio","comment_count":"0","amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3132"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3132"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3132\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3134,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3132\/revisions\/3134"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2882"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3132"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3132"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3132"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}