A 4\u00aa C\u00e2mara de Direito Privado do Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a de S\u00e3o Paulo manteve decis\u00e3o da 2\u00aa Vara de Fam\u00edlia e das Sucess\u00f5es de S\u00e3o Jos\u00e9 dos Campos, da ju\u00edza Alessandra Barrea Laranjeiras, que reconheceu paternidade ap\u00f3s o n\u00e3o comparecimento do requerido para realiza\u00e7\u00e3o de exame de DNA. De acordo com os autos, a autora realizou procedimento de investiga\u00e7\u00e3o com dois poss\u00edveis genitores. Um deles realizou o exame de DNA, com resultado negativo. O outro homem, mesmo regularmente intimado por duas vezes, n\u00e3o compareceu ao exame e n\u00e3o justificou a aus\u00eancia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Em seu voto, o relator do recurso, desembargador Vitor Frederico K\u00fcmpel, apontou que, apesar de ser certo que uma parte n\u00e3o \u00e9 obrigada a produzir provas contra si mesmo, a l\u00f3gica n\u00e3o se aplica em casos de investiga\u00e7\u00e3o de paternidade. O magistrado avaliou que \u201ca n\u00e3o realiza\u00e7\u00e3o da prova pericial por recusa injustificada do suposto pai, gera a presun\u00e7\u00e3o juris tantum de paternidade, de modo a inverter o \u00f4nus da prova\u201d. Dessa forma, segundo o desembargador, passou a ser do requerido a comprova\u00e7\u00e3o da n\u00e3o paternidade, o que n\u00e3o ocorreu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tamb\u00e9m participaram do julgamento os desembargadores Enio Zuliani e F\u00e1bio Quadros. A decis\u00e3o foi por maioria de votos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
TJSP 28.03.2023<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
N\u00e3o comparecimento inverteu o \u00f4nus da prova.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3247,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[11,28],"tags":[2000,2002,1689,2444],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/pexels-photo-4792284.jpeg?fit=868%2C1300&ssl=1","featured_image_urls":{"full":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/pexels-photo-4792284.jpeg?fit=868%2C1300&ssl=1",868,1300,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/pexels-photo-4792284.jpeg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/pexels-photo-4792284.jpeg?fit=200%2C300&ssl=1",200,300,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/pexels-photo-4792284.jpeg?fit=640%2C958&ssl=1",640,958,true],"large":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/pexels-photo-4792284.jpeg?fit=640%2C958&ssl=1",640,958,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/pexels-photo-4792284.jpeg?fit=868%2C1300&ssl=1",868,1300,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/pexels-photo-4792284.jpeg?fit=868%2C1300&ssl=1",868,1300,true],"covernews-slider-full":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/pexels-photo-4792284.jpeg?resize=868%2C715&ssl=1",868,715,true],"covernews-slider-center":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/pexels-photo-4792284.jpeg?resize=800%2C500&ssl=1",800,500,true],"covernews-featured":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/pexels-photo-4792284.jpeg?fit=868%2C1300&ssl=1",868,1300,true],"covernews-medium":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/pexels-photo-4792284.jpeg?resize=540%2C340&ssl=1",540,340,true],"covernews-medium-square":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/pexels-photo-4792284.jpeg?resize=400%2C250&ssl=1",400,250,true]},"author_info":{"display_name":"bfsadvocacia","author_link":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/author\/bfsadvocacia\/"},"category_info":"advogado sp<\/a> atualidades jur\u00eddicas<\/a>","tag_info":"atualidades jur\u00eddicas","comment_count":"0","amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3246"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3246"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3246\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3248,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3246\/revisions\/3248"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3247"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3246"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3246"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.bfsadvocacia.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3246"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}